Name: News Media Coverage of the Vice-Presidential Selection Process: What's Wrong with the Veepstakes? (en Inglés)
Price: 243.63 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Devine, Christopher J.
ISBN: 9783031281655

portada News Media Coverage of the Vice-Presidential Selection Process: What's Wrong with the Veepstakes? (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Christopher J. Devine

Editorial

Palgrave MacMillan

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

137

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

21.0 x 14.8 x 1.1 cm

Peso

0.34 kg.

ISBN13

9783031281655

Categorías

Estados unidos de américa
Periodismo
La democracia
Noticias y periodismo

News Media Coverage of the Vice-Presidential Selection Process: What's Wrong with the Veepstakes? (en Inglés)

Christopher J. Devine (Autor) · Palgrave MacMillan · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

S/ 243,63

S/ 487,26

Ahorras: S/ 243,63

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 04 de Junio y el Martes 18 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "News Media Coverage of the Vice-Presidential Selection Process: What's Wrong with the Veepstakes? (en Inglés)"

This book provides the first systematic, empirical analysis of the media's approach to US vice-presidential selection (or the "veepstakes"). In their news coverage, Devine finds that media outlets typically treat vice-presidential selection as little more than a game--by focusing on how potential running mates might help to win the election, rather than how they might help the next president to govern. Based on an original content analysis of hundreds of veepstakes profiles from 2000-2020, this book quantifies the news media's relative emphasis on various selection criteria, in general and across different electoral circumstances. The analysis suggests that journalists generally fail to serve the public interest by emphasizing electoral over governing considerations. However, Devine also points to positive examples of media coverage that help the public to evaluate potential running mates' governing credentials, and suggests ways in which scholars, journalists, and citizens might encourage media outlets to provide more substantive, responsible coverage of the vice-presidential selection process in future elections.