Name: The Trial of Alex Henson (en Inglés)
Price: 125.14 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Ross, Donald R.
ISBN: 9781637923818

portada The Trial of Alex Henson (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Donald R. Ross

Editorial

Beyond Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

338

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm

Peso

0.45 kg.

ISBN13

9781637923818

Categorías

Tribunales y procedimientos del ordenamiento jurídico
Proceso penal

The Trial of Alex Henson (en Inglés)

Donald R. Ross (Autor) · Beyond Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

S/ 125,14

S/ 250,28

Ahorras: S/ 125,14

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 10 de Junio y el Lunes 24 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Trial of Alex Henson (en Inglés)"

The Trial of Alex Henson contains the actual transcript of a high profile criminal casetried in an East Texas town in 1953. Henson was accused of a late-night burglary ofthe private residence of a prominent physician and assaulting that physician's wifewith a gun while the doctor was away on an emergency call. Henson was Black and his alleged victim was white. The case stirred the emotions of both the white and the Black communities. The whites were outraged that a Black man had allegedlycommitted this vicious attack on a highly respected lady in the community. Theiroutrage was matched by a high level of skepticism in the Black community thatHenson was the one who committed it. The indictment charged Henson with burglary of a private residence at night with intent to commit rape. The trial had the intrigue of having a highly skilled local defense attorney as the special prosecutor, hired by the doctor, and a former District Attorney of a large urban county in Texas, reportedly hired by the NAACP, as the defense attorney. The trial transcript is analyzed by a retired trial and appellate judge who attended the trial as a 14-year-old boy and gives his unique perspective on the judge, the lawyers, the jury, and the evidence in this case.