Name: Truman's Court: A Study in Judicial Restraint (en Inglés)
Price: 382.31 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Frances Howell Rudko
ISBN: 9780313263163

portada Truman's Court: A Study in Judicial Restraint (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Praeger

Autor

Frances Howell Rudko

Año

1988

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

186

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0313263167

ISBN13

9780313263163

Categorías

Tribunales y procedimientos del ordenamiento jurídico

Truman's Court: A Study in Judicial Restraint (en Inglés)

Frances Howell Rudko (Autor) · Praeger · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

S/ 382,31

S/ 764,61

Ahorras: S/ 382,31

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 06 de Junio y el Jueves 20 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Truman's Court: A Study in Judicial Restraint (en Inglés)"

A concise, well-written examination by a lawyer-historian of the judicial restraint philosophies of President Truman's four appointees to the Supreme Court: Harold Burton, Fred Vinson, Tom Clark, and Sherman Minton. Rudko's analysis of the four men's opinions in criminal procedure, loyalty-security, racial discrimination, and alien rights cases show that Truman was far more successful than most presidents in choosing justices whose view of the judicial role matched his own. Choice Much of the debate surrounding the Supreme Court can be traced to the notion that the Court is primarily a political rather than a judicial institution. When the Court is viewed from an ideological standpoint, it becomes tempting, for example, to equate judicial restraint with conservatism, and activism with a liberal political perspective. In her study of the Truman Court, Rudko demonstrates the fallacy of the political approach. Focusing of the record of President Truman's four liberal appointees, she looks at the judicial philosophy underlying important decisions involving the rights of individuals and shows how judicial issues--especially the balance between restraint and activism--have determined the decision-making process.