Name: Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding (en Inglés)
Price: 300.28 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Braithwaite, John ; Braithwaite, Valerie ; Cookson, Michael
ISBN: 9781921666223

portada Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Editorial

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

518

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

25.0 x 17.6 x 3.6 cm

Peso

1.17 kg.

ISBN13

9781921666223

Categorías

Estudios sobre la paz y resolución de conflictos
Violencia y abusos en la sociedad

Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding (en Inglés)

John Braithwaite (Autor) · Valerie Braithwaite (Autor) · Michael Cookson (Autor) · Anu Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 300,28

S/ 600,56

Ahorras: S/ 300,28

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 23 de Julio y el Martes 06 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding (en Inglés)"

Indonesia suffered an explosion of religious violence, ethnic violence, separatist violence, terrorism, and violence by criminal gangs, the security forces and militias in the late 1990s and early 2000s. By 2002 Indonesia had the worst terrorism problem of any nation. All these forms of violence have now fallen dramatically. How was this accomplished? What drove the rise and the fall of violence? Anomie theory is deployed to explain these developments. Sudden institutional change at the time of the Asian financial crisis and the fall of President Suharto meant the rules of the game were up for grabs. Valerie Braithwaite's motivational postures theory is used to explain the gaming of the rules and the disengagement from authority that occurred in that era. Ultimately resistance to Suharto laid a foundation for commitment to a revised, more democratic, institutional order. The peacebuilding that occurred was not based on the high-integrity truth-seeking and reconciliation that was the normative preference of these authors. Rather it was based on non-truth, sometimes lies, and yet substantial reconciliation. This poses a challenge to restorative justice theories of peacebuilding.