Name: Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) (en Inglés)
SKU: 62734795
Price: 482.82 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Gallego Ángel J.,Ott Dennis
ISBN: 9780198867937

portada Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) (en Inglés)

Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Oxford University Press

Autor

Gallego Ángel J.,Ott Dennis

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

336

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9780198867937

Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) (en Inglés)

Gallego Ángel J.,Ott Dennis (Autor) · Oxford University Press · Tapa Dura

Más barato Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 16 a 22 días háb.

S/ 1.072,93S/ 482,82

-55%

Más rápido Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 9 a 14 días háb.

S/ 1.212,12S/ 545,45

-55%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo Más barato

Quedan 40 unidades

S/ 482,82

Llega entre el 16 Nov y el 25 Nov a CERCADO DE LIMA, Lima. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) (en Inglés)"

This book contributes to the ongoing empirical, conceptual, and meta-theoretical debates regarding the merits and drawbacks of the cartographic program in linguistic theory. Although cartography has its roots in the study of the left periphery, its empirical scope has expanded significantly over the years and now covers a wide range of domains such as argument structure, modification, and constituent order. The chapters in this volume offer a critical examination of the cartographic assumption that there is a rich array of functional projections whose hierarchical order is fixed and determined by Universal Grammar. They discuss the nature of these cartographic hierarchies and their relation to the central theoretical goal of explanatory adequacy: are functional hierarchies an irreducible property of Universal Grammar (hence constituting part of the "residue" beyond the scope of principled explanation), or are they emergent, deriving from independent principles that do not require a further enrichment of Universal Grammar?