Name: Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (en Inglés)
SKU: 58429619
Price: 241.87 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Giacco, Letizia Lo
ISBN: 9781509948987

portada Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (en Inglés)

Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Letizia Lo Giacco

Editorial

Hart Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

232

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4x15.6x1.2 cm

Peso

0.33 kg.

ISBN13

9781509948987

Categorías

Derecho internacional

Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (en Inglés)

Letizia Lo Giacco (Autor) · Hart Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Más barato Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 13 a 18 días háb.

S/ 537,49S/ 241,87

-55%

Más rápido Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 13 a 17 días háb.

S/ 594,58S/ 297,29

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo Más barato

Quedan más de 100 unidades

S/ 241,87

Llega entre el 17 Nov y el 25 Nov a CERCADO DE LIMA, Lima. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (en Inglés)"

This book explores the question of how the multiplication of judicial decisions on international law has influenced the way in which legal findings in international law adjudication are justified. International law practitioners frequently cite judicial decisions to persuade. Courts interpreting international law are no exception to this practice. However, judicial decisions do much more than persuading: they enable and constrain interpretive discretion. Instead of taking the road of the sources of international law, this book turns to the somewhat uncharted terrain of legal argumentation. Using international criminal law as a case study, it shows how the growing number of judicial decisions has normalised courts' resort to them in legal justification and enabled some argumentative practices to become constitutive of international law. In so doing, it critically revisits the implications of an iterative use of judicial decisions, and reassesses the influence of the 'judicialisation turn' on the ways in which the meaning of international law is formed, shaped and reshaped by reference to judicial decisions.