Name: Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in the uk, us and eu: From Principles to Practice (en Inglés)
Price: 640.43 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Justine N Stefanelli
ISBN: 9781509930456

portada Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in the uk, us and eu: From Principles to Practice (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Hart Publishing

Autor

Justine N Stefanelli

Año

2020

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

248

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781509930456

Categorías

Derecho de la inmigración

Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in the uk, us and eu: From Principles to Practice (en Inglés)

Justine N Stefanelli (Autor) · Hart Publishing · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

S/ 640,43

S/ 1.280,85

Ahorras: S/ 640,43

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 28 de Mayo y el Martes 11 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in the uk, us and eu: From Principles to Practice (en Inglés)"

Immigration detention is considered by many states to be a necessary tool in the execution of immigration policy. Despite the apparently key role it plays in immigration enforcement, the law on immigration detention is often vague, especially in relation to determining the circumstances under which prolonged detention remains lawful. As a result, the courts are frequently called upon to adjudicate these matters, with scant legal tools at their disposal. Though there have been some significant judgments on the legality of detention at the constitutional level, the extent to which these judgments have had an impact at the lower end of the judiciary is unclear. Indeed, it is the lower courts which are tasked with judging the legality of detention through habeas corpus or judicial review proceedings. This book examines the way this has occurred in the lower courts of two jurisdictions, the UK and the US, and contrasts this practice not only in those jurisdictions, but with judgments rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union, a constitutional court at the other end of the judicial spectrum whose judgments are applied by courts and tribunals in the EU Member States. Although these three jurisdictions use similar tests to evaluate the legality of detention, case outcomes significantly differ. Many factors contribute to this divergence, but key among them is the role that fundamental rights protection plays in each jurisdiction. Through a forensic evaluation of 191 judgments, this book compares the laws on detention in the UK, US and EU, and makes recommendations to these jurisdictions for improvement.