Name: Non-Statutory Executive Powers and Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 36) (en Inglés)
Price: 457.10 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Allen, Jason Grant
ISBN: 9781316510667

portada Non-Statutory Executive Powers and Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 36) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jason Grant Allen

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

256

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 2.1 cm

Peso

0.64 kg.

ISBN13

9781316510667

Categorías

Derecho constitucional

Non-Statutory Executive Powers and Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 36) (en Inglés)

Jason Grant Allen (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

S/ 457,10

S/ 914,20

Ahorras: S/ 457,10

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 18 de Junio y el Viernes 28 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Non-Statutory Executive Powers and Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, Series Number 36) (en Inglés)"

That non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves.