Name: Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience (en Inglés)
SKU: 57205583
Price: 245.73 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Schulkin, Jay
ISBN: 9783030231026

portada Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience (en Inglés)

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jay Schulkin

Editorial

Palgrave MacMillan

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

355

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

21x14.8x2.1 cm

Peso

0.48 kg.

ISBN13

9783030231026

Categorías

Obras de consulta
Pragmatismo
Filosofía social y política

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience (en Inglés)

Jay Schulkin (Autor) · Palgrave MacMillan · Tapa Blanda

Más barato Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 13 a 17 días háb.

S/ 546,07S/ 245,73

-55%

Más rápido Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 9 a 14 días háb.

S/ 725,44S/ 326,45

-55%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo Más barato

Quedan 50 unidades

S/ 245,73

Llega entre el 01 Oct y el 09 Oct a CERCADO DE LIMA, Lima. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience (en Inglés)"

This book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes' Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliableand more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events.