Compartir
Review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management "Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico Region" Study
Board On Atmospheric Sciences And Climate;Engineering, And Medicine National Academies Of Sciences;Division On Earth And Life Studies;Committee For The Review Of The Boem "Air Quality Modeling In The Gulf Of Mexico" Study (Autor)
·
National Academies Press
· Tapa Blanda
Review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management "Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico Region" Study - Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate;Engineering, and Medicine National Academies of Sciences;Division on Earth and Life Studies;Committee for the Review of the BOEM "Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico" Study
Más barato Libro Nuevo
Importado
Envío: 20 a 25 días háb.
S/ 335,41S/ 150,93
Más rápido Libro Nuevo
Importado
Envío: 11 a 16 días háb.
S/ 345,25S/ 172,63
Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅
Reseña del libro "Review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management "Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico Region" Study"
Emissions associated with oil and gas exploration, development, and production on the Gulf waters can result in increased levels of air pollutants that contribute to a range of air quality impacts in the Gulf of Mexico Region (GOMR). "Criteria air pollutants", such as carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide, are considered harmful to public health and the environment. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) manages the U.S. outer continental shelf oil and gas resources and is required to help manage air quality in the GOMR. Review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management "Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico Region" Study reviews and provides feedback on the BOEM's Air Quality Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico Region Study. This independent technical review of the study explores whether the study meets its goals, accurately reflects the scientific literature, uses reasonable data and modeling analyses, approaches quantitative modeling appropriately, documents findings in a consistent, transparent, and credible way, and aligns with necessary guidelines. Table of ContentsFront MatterSummary1 Introduction2 Committee's Review of the StudyReferencesAppendix A: Statement of TaskAppendix B: Committee BiographiesAppendix C: AcronymsAppendix D: Data for Figures S.1, 2.2, and 2.3