Name: The Perils of Posting: Court Cases on Off-Duty Social Media Conduct of Public Employees (en Inglés)
Price: 417.01 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Foote, Paul Douglas ; Harrington, James R. ; McCaskill, John
ISBN: 9781498588928

portada The Perils of Posting: Court Cases on Off-Duty Social Media Conduct of Public Employees (en Inglés)

The Perils of Posting: Court Cases on Off-Duty Social Media Conduct of Public Employees (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Editorial

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

126

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.1 cm

Peso

0.36 kg.

ISBN13

9781498588928

Categorías

Cuestiones éticas: censura
Políticas del gobierno central

The Perils of Posting: Court Cases on Off-Duty Social Media Conduct of Public Employees (en Inglés)

Paul Douglas Foote (Autor) · James R. Harrington (Autor) · John McCaskill (Autor) · Lexington Books · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 13 a 18 días háb.

S/ 926,70S/ 417,01

-55%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

S/ 417,01

Llega entre el 09 Jul y el 17 Jul a CERCADO DE LIMA, Lima. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Perils of Posting: Court Cases on Off-Duty Social Media Conduct of Public Employees (en Inglés)"

In recent years, there has been an increase of public employees being fired for inappropriate behavior on social media. This research explores social media conduct of public employees that have been adjudicated through the federal and state court systems. The arguments of these cases are based upon the question of an employee's first amendment rights versus the rights of the employer to maintain a desired work environment. The research found that widespread negative publicity, disruption of close working relationships, inappropriate and offensive employees comments led to favorable outcomes for the public employers. In contrast, when an employee posts on social media while off-duty as a private citizen, the employer has not cited any disruption and the comments are not personal attacks against employers but have substantial public concerns led to positive outcomes for the public employee.