Name: The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution (en Inglés)
Price: 571.75 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Graham Gee; Robert Hazell; Kate Malleson
ISBN: 9781107066953

portada The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution (en Inglés)

The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Graham Gee; Robert Hazell; Kate Malleson

Año

2015

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

306

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781107066953

Categorías

Ordenamientos jurídicos: proceso civil

The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution (en Inglés)

Graham Gee; Robert Hazell; Kate Malleson (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 17 días háb.

S/ 1.270,55S/ 571,75

-55%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

S/ 571,75

Llega entre el 06 Jul y el 14 Jul a CERCADO DE LIMA, Lima. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution (en Inglés)"

Judicial independence is generally understood as requiring that judges must be insulated from political life. The central claim of this work is that far from standing apart from the political realm, judicial independence is a product of it. It is defined and protected through interactions between judges and politicians. In short, judicial independence is a political achievement. This is the main conclusion of a three-year research project on the major changes introduced by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, and the consequences for judicial independence and accountability. The authors interviewed over 150 judges, politicians, civil servants and practitioners to understand the day-to-day processes of negotiation and interaction between politicians and judges. They conclude that the greatest threat to judicial independence in future may lie not from politicians actively seeking to undermine the courts, but rather from their increasing disengagement from the justice system and the judiciary.