Name: Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (en Inglés)
Price: 169.54 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Lipshaw, Jeffrey
ISBN: 9781138344020

portada Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jeffrey Lipshaw

Editorial

Routledge

Año

2018

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

170

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781138344020

N° edición

Categorías

Educación superior
Ejercicio profesional del derecho

Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (en Inglés)

Jeffrey Lipshaw (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 169,54

S/ 339,09

Ahorras: S/ 169,54

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 05 de Julio y el Martes 23 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (en Inglés)"

The concept of learning to 'think like a lawyer' is one of the cornerstones of legal education in the United States and beyond. In this book, Jeffrey Lipshaw provides a critique of the traditional views of 'thinking like a lawyer' or 'pure lawyering' aimed at lawyers, law professors, and students who want to understand lawyering beyond the traditional warrior metaphor. Drawing on his extensive experience at the intersection of real world law and business issues, Professor Lipshaw presents a sophisticated philosophical argument that the "pure lawyering" of traditional legal education is agnostic to either truth or moral value of outcomes. He demonstrates pure lawyering's potential both for illusions of certainty and cynical instrumentalism, and the consequences of both when lawyers are called on as dealmakers, policymakers, and counsellors.This book offers an avenue for getting beyond (or unlearning) merely how to think like a lawyer. It combines legal theory, philosophy of knowledge, and doctrine with an appreciation of real-life judgment calls that multi-disciplinary lawyers are called upon to make. The book will be of great interest to scholars of legal education, legal language and reasoning as well as professors who teach both doctrine and thinking and writing skills in the first year law school curriculum; and for anyone who is interested in seeking a perspective on 'thinking like a lawyer' beyond the litigation arena.