Name: Collusion: Judicial Discretion vs. Judicial Deception - the Impending Meltdown of the United States Federal Judicial System (en Inglés)
Price: 200.89 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Brian J. Donovan
ISBN: 9781634928441

portada Collusion: Judicial Discretion vs. Judicial Deception - the Impending Meltdown of the United States Federal Judicial System (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Brian J. Donovan

Año

2017

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

476

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781634928441

Categorías

Códigos y derechos civiles

Collusion: Judicial Discretion vs. Judicial Deception - the Impending Meltdown of the United States Federal Judicial System (en Inglés)

Brian J. Donovan (Autor) · · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 200,89

S/ 401,77

Ahorras: S/ 200,89

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 07 de Junio y el Viernes 21 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Collusion: Judicial Discretion vs. Judicial Deception - the Impending Meltdown of the United States Federal Judicial System (en Inglés)"

The meltdown of the U.S. federal judicial system will occur when the public realizes that: (a) judicial discretion in MDLs is replaced by judicial deception; (b) MDLs are grossly unfair, unreasonable, and inadequate for the plaintiffs; and (c) a relatively small group of self-interested “cooperative” attorneys are permitted to be grossly over-compensated for merely acting as dealmakers.The immediate cause of the 2008 meltdown of the financial services industry was the explosion in the unregulated market of CDOs on the frontend and CDSs on the backend. The immediate cause of the meltdown of the U.S. federal judicial system will be MDL's unauthorized use of victims’ compensation funds on the frontend and settlement class actions on the backend.As Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham explains, “The disconnect between the power of the MDL judge and the power that the judge exercises rests on a statute that authorizes only the transfer of cases to that judge for purposes of pretrial proceeding with return to their filing homes, as the U.S. Supreme Court made clear in Lexecon. The rest of the operation finds its footing in some form of consent and assertions of implied and inherent authority sometimes on little more than empty air.”