Name: Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham (en Inglés)
Price: 500.60 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Pixley, Jocelyn ; Harcourt, G.
ISBN: 9781349454006

portada Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jocelyn Pixley

Editorial

Palgrave MacMillan

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

329

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

21.6 x 14.0 x 1.8 cm

Peso

0.40 kg.

ISBN13

9781349454006

Categorías

Economía monetaria
Microeconomía

Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham (en Inglés)

Jocelyn Pixley (Autor) · Palgrave MacMillan · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 500,60

S/ 1.001,20

Ahorras: S/ 500,60

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 06 de Agosto y el Martes 20 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham (en Inglés)"

This volume is a debate about a sociology and economics of money: a form of positive trespassing. It is unique in being written by scholars of both disciplines committed to this mutual venture and in starting from the original groundwork laid by Geoffrey Ingham. The contributors look critically at money's institutions and the meanings and history of money-creation and show the cross cutting purposes or incommensurable sides of money and its crises. These arise from severe tensions and social conflicts about the production of money and its many purposes. We demonstrate the centrality of money to capitalism and consider social disorders since the 2007 crisis, which marks the timeliness and need for dialogue. Both disciplines have far too much to offer to remain in the former, damaging standoff. While we are thankful to see a possible diminution of this split, remnants are maintained by mainstream economic and sociological theorists who, after all the crises of the past 30 years, and many before, still hold to an argument that money really does not 'matter'. We suggest, to many different and interested audiences, that since money is a promise, understanding this social relation must be a joint though plural task between economics and sociology at the very least.