Name: International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law: 150 (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law)
Price: 461.21 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Cait Storr
ISBN: 9781108498500

portada International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law: 150 (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Cait Storr

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781108498500

Categorías

Derecho internacional

International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law: 150 (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law)

Cait Storr (Autor) · · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

S/ 461,21

S/ 922,43

Ahorras: S/ 461,21

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 20 de Junio y el Lunes 01 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law: 150 (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law)"

Nauru is often figured as an anomaly in the international order. This book offers a new account of Nauru's imperial history and examines its significance to the histories of international law. Drawing on theories of jurisdiction and bureaucracy, it reconstructs four shifts in Nauru's status – from German protectorate, to League of Nations C Mandate, to UN Trust Territory, to sovereign state – as a means of redescribing the transition from the nineteenth century imperial order to the twentieth century state system. The book argues that as international status shifts, imperial form accretes: as Nauru's status shifted, what occurred at the local level was a gradual process of bureaucratisation. Two conclusions emerge from this argument. The first is that imperial administration in Nauru produced the Republic's post-independence 'failures'. The second is that international recognition of sovereign status is best understood as marking a beginning, not an end, of the process of decolonisation.