Name: Sexual Difference, Gender, and Agency in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (en Inglés)
Price: 740.10 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Bodley-Dangelo, Faye
ISBN: 9780567679307

portada Sexual Difference, Gender, and Agency in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Faye Bodley-Dangelo

Editorial

Bloomsbury Publishing PLC

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

208

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

23.6 x 16.0 x 2.0 cm

Peso

0.43 kg.

ISBN13

9780567679307

Categorías

Cristianismo
Teología

Sexual Difference, Gender, and Agency in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (en Inglés)

Faye Bodley-Dangelo (Autor) · Bloomsbury Publishing PLC · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

S/ 740,10

S/ 1.480,20

Ahorras: S/ 740,10

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 06 de Agosto y el Martes 20 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Sexual Difference, Gender, and Agency in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (en Inglés)"

This volume is a critical and constructive analysis of the sexually differentiated self in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatic. It secures in his Christocentric pattern of human agency an untapped resource for unsettling and reimagining the heteropatriarchal structure of human fellowship at the heart of his theological anthropology.Moving through Barth's doctrines of revelation, creation, theological anthropology, and special ethics, Faye Bodley-Dangelo locates the human agent in his broader project aimed at re-habilitating the subject of modern protestant theology. She argues the human actor comes into view as the recipient of Christ's redemptive activity, which redirects it out of self-aggrandizing isolation and into relationships of dependency, responsiveness, and ethical responsibility to multiple sites of divine and creaturely alterity. The book debates that Barth's model of human agency cannot on its own terms sustain his version of female subordination nor his repudiation of same-sex relationships. Rather, it contains ethically-oriented, critical and reflective mechanisms that resist the sexist heterosexist dimension of his theological anthropology and lend themselves to an anti-essentialist performative account of gender.