Name: The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences (Texts in German Philosophy) (en Inglés)
Price: 258.92 PEN
Availability: InStock
Author: Heinrich Rickert
ISBN: 9780521310154

portada The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences (Texts in German Philosophy) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Heinrich Rickert

Año

1986

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

276

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN

0521310156

ISBN13

9780521310154

Categorías

Historia de la humanidad

The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences (Texts in German Philosophy) (en Inglés)

Heinrich Rickert (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

S/ 258,92

S/ 517,84

Ahorras: S/ 258,92

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 11 de Julio y el Lunes 22 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Perú entre 2 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences (Texts in German Philosophy) (en Inglés)"

Heinrich Rickert (1863–1936) was one of the leading neo-Kantian philosophers in Germany and a crucial figure in the discussions of the foundations of the social sciences in the first quarter of the twentieth century. His views were extremely influential, most significantly on Max Weber. The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science is Rickert's most important work, and it is here translated into English for the first time. It presents his systematic theory of knowledge and philosophy of science, and deals particularly with historical knowledge and the problem of demarcating the natural from the human sciences. The theory Rickert develops is carefully argued and of great intrinsic interest. It departs from both positivism and neo-Hegelian idealism and is worked out by contrast to the views of others, particularly Dilthey and the early phenomenologists.